Join Los Angeles Review of Books Newsletter


Images © Eggleston Artistic Trust

Geoff Nicholson shares his thoughts on photography, William Eggleston, and the downside of exhibitions:

I’d also argue that books are the very best way of looking at a photographer’s work, preferable to seeing them on a gallery wall, for instance. Of course the gallery print is likely to be more “authentic,” closer to the source, closer to the photographer’s intentions, and often signed and therefore touched by the artist’s hand. But equally, in a gallery the print is going to be behind glass, there’s going to be some twerp standing in front of it, blocking your view, perhaps expressing loud, dreary insights. And there are real limits to how long anybody can stand in a gallery looking at photographs, how many images you can really look at in a session without getting sated, without losing your concentration and judgment.

Read the rest here.

  1. fyeahwilliameggleston reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  2. gunk96 reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  3. meowtriarchy reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  4. closetvisualpoet reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  5. what-are-you-doing-here reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  6. abluworld reblogged this from lareviewofbooks
  7. lareviewofbooks posted this
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Search